Sep 11, 2017 In Kali Linux, Sqlmap is pre-installed but for Windows, you can easily install Sqlmap using Python Interpreter. There are two series of python, 2.7.x and 3.3.x. Sqlmap should run fine with both versions, so you can choose any version. If you are creative and ambitious, you can find numerous web sites that list vulnerable web sites. You might want to check these out. For our purposes here and to keep you out of the long reach of the law, we will be hacking a website designed for this purpose, www.webscantest.com.
You can subscribe to this list.2008JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2009JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2010JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2011JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2012JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2013JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2014JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2015JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2016JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2017JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2018JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec2019JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec. Attachments:Subject/Topic: How do I determine if versions of phpMyAdmin before 4.8.5 is SQL Injectable using sqlmap?Good evening from Singapore,Our customer (company name is Confidential/not disclosed) reported that their MySQL database has been found missing or was deleted a few times. They are using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Linux server with Apache2 Web Server, MySQL and PHP (LAMP).We responded to these security incidents by changing the passwords of the regular user, root user, and MySQL database user root. We have also examined /var/log/auth.log and think that the hacker could not have come in through ssh or sftp over ssh. From /var/log/mysql/error.log, we can ascertain that the MySQL database has been deleted at certain timings.
We have also found nothing abnormal after examining /var/log/apache2/access.log.Even though we have secured the Ubuntu Linux server by changing passwords, the hacker was still able to delete our customer's MySQL database again and again. I have already proposed to install ModSecurity Open Source Web Application Firewall (WAF) to defend against web application attacks but my boss has told me to put that on hold at the moment. In fact, I have already deployed ModSecurity 2.9.0 on a Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.Testing. server and found that it actively detects and logs Nessus and sqlmap vulnerability scans in blocking mode.Since we did not find any evidence that the hacker had breached our customer's Ubuntu 16.04 LTS production server through ssh or Teamviewer, we suspect that the hacker could have achieved it by SQL injection. I took the initiative of downloading and installing Nessus Professional 8.3.1 Trial version for Windows 64-bit. The vulnerability scan report generated by Nessus Web Application Tests shows that our customer is using a version of phpMyAdmin prior to 4.8.5 which could be vulnerable to SQL injection using the designer feature.Further research shows that I can use sqlmap to determine if phpMyAdmin is SQL injectable. I already have a Testing Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Linux server with a Testing MySQL database and a Testing phpMyAdmin 4.8.4.
I have purposely installed phpMyAdmin 4.8.4 because this version was reported to be vulnerable to SQL injection using the designer feature, and our customer is using a vulnerable version, according to CVE-2019-6798 ( ). Then I proceeded to download and execute sqlmap on our Ubuntu Linux desktop against our Testing server.No matter how many commands I try, sqlmap always report that phpMyAdmin 4.8.4 is.NOT. SQL injectable. Perhaps I was using the wrong sqlmap commands all the time?
The following is one of the many sqlmap commands I have used.$ python sqlmap.py -u '; -level=1 -dbms=mysql -sql-query='drop database'Replace database by database name.May I know what is the correct sqlmap command that I should use to determine that my Testing phpMyAdmin 4.8.4 is SQL injectable? I would like to know if I can successfully drop/delete the Testing database on our Testing server. If I can successfully drop/delete the Testing MySQL database using sqlmap, I would be able to conclude that the hacker must have carried out SQL injection to drop/delete the customer's database. I have already turned off the Testing ModSecurity Web Application Firewall on our Testing server to allow sqlmap to go through.Please point me to any good tutorial on SQL injection using sqlmap. Maybe I do not understand SQL injection well enough. Our customer is also using a customised in-house inventory management system that relies on PHP application and MySQL database.Would open source Snort Intrusion Detection System (IDS) and Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) be able to detect and block SQL injection as well?Please advise.Thank you very much.-BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE-The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs):The New York Times Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills ofU.S.
Embassy WorkersLink:.Singaporean Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's AcademicQualifications as at 14 Feb 2019123-END EMAIL SIGNATURE.
Subject/Topic: How do I determine if versions of phpMyAdmin before 4.8.5 is SQL Injectable using sqlmap?Good evening from Singapore,Our customer (company name is Confidential/not disclosed) reported that their MySQL database has been found missing or was deleted a few times. They are using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Linux server with Apache2 Web Server, MySQL and PHP (LAMP).We responded to these security incidents by changing the passwords of the regular user, root user, and MySQL database user root.
We have also examined /var/log/auth.log and think that the hacker could not have come in through ssh or sftp over ssh. From /var/log/mysql/error.log, we can ascertain that the MySQL database has been deleted at certain timings. We have also found nothing abnormal after examining /var/log/apache2/access.log.Even though we have secured the Ubuntu Linux server by changing passwords, the hacker was still able to delete our customer's MySQL database again and again. I have already proposed to install ModSecurity Open Source Web Application Firewall (WAF) to defend against web application attacks but my boss has told me to put that on hold at the moment.
In fact, I have already deployed ModSecurity 2.9.0 on a Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.Testing. server and found that it actively detects and logs Nessus and sqlmap vulnerability scans in blocking mode.Since we did not find any evidence that the hacker had breached our customer's Ubuntu 16.04 LTS production server through ssh or Teamviewer, we suspect that the hacker could have achieved it by SQL injection. I took the initiative of downloading and installing Nessus Professional 8.3.1 Trial version for Windows 64-bit.
The vulnerability scan report generated by Nessus Web Application Tests shows that our customer is using a version of phpMyAdmin prior to 4.8.5 which could be vulnerable to SQL injection using the designer feature.Further research shows that I can use sqlmap to determine if phpMyAdmin is SQL injectable. I already have a Testing Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Linux server with a Testing MySQL database and a Testing phpMyAdmin 4.8.4. I have purposely installed phpMyAdmin 4.8.4 because this version was reported to be vulnerable to SQL injection using the designer feature, and our customer is using a vulnerable version, according to CVE-2019-6798 ( ). Then I proceeded to download and execute sqlmap on our Ubuntu Linux desktop against our Testing server.No matter how many commands I try, sqlmap always report that phpMyAdmin 4.8.4 is.NOT. SQL injectable.
Perhaps I was using the wrong sqlmap commands all the time? The following is one of the many sqlmap commands I have used.$ python sqlmap.py -u '; -level=1 -dbms=mysql -sql-query='drop database'Replace database by database name.May I know what is the correct sqlmap command that I should use to determine that my Testing phpMyAdmin 4.8.4 is SQL injectable? I would like to know if I can successfully drop/delete the Testing database on our Testing server. If I can successfully drop/delete the Testing MySQL database using sqlmap, I would be able to conclude that the hacker must have carried out SQL injection to drop/delete the customer's database. I have already turned off the Testing ModSecurity Web Application Firewall on our Testing server to allow sqlmap to go through.Please point me to any good tutorial on SQL injection using sqlmap. Maybe I do not understand SQL injection well enough.
Our customer is also using a customised in-house inventory management system that relies on PHP application and MySQL database.Would open source Snort Intrusion Detection System (IDS) and Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) be able to detect and block SQL injection as well?Please advise.Thank you very much.-BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE-The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs):The New York Times Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills ofU.S. Embassy WorkersLink:.Singaporean Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's AcademicQualifications as at 14 Feb 2019123-END EMAIL SIGNATURE. Subject/Topic: How do I determine if versions of phpMyAdmin before4.8.5 is SQL Injectable using sqlmap?Good evening from Singapore,Our customer (company name is Confidential/not disclosed) reportedthat their MySQL database has been found missing or was deleted a fewtimes.
They are using Ubuntu 16.04 LTS Linux server with Apache2 WebServer, MySQL and PHP (LAMP).We responded to these security incidents by changing the passwords ofthe regular user, root user, and MySQL database user root. We havealso examined /var/log/auth.log and think that the hacker could nothave come in through ssh or sftp over ssh. From/var/log/mysql/error.log, we can ascertain that the MySQL database hasbeen deleted at certain timings. We have also found nothing abnormalafter examining /var/log/apache2/access.log.Even though we have secured the Ubuntu Linux server by changingpasswords, the hacker was still able to delete our customer's MySQLdatabase again and again. I have already proposed to installModSecurity Open Source Web Application Firewall (WAF) to defendagainst web application attacks but my boss has told me to put that onhold at the moment.
In fact, I have already deployed ModSecurity 2.9.0on a Ubuntu 16.04 LTS.Testing. server and found that it activelydetects and logs Nessus and sqlmap vulnerability scans in blockingmode.Since we did not find any evidence that the hacker had breached ourcustomer's Ubuntu 16.04 LTS production server through ssh orTeamviewer, we suspect that the hacker could have achieved it by SQLinjection.
I took the initiative of downloading and installing NessusProfessional 8.3.1 Trial version for Windows 64-bit. The vulnerabilityscan report generated by Nessus Web Application Tests shows that ourcustomer is using a version of phpMyAdmin prior to 4.8.5 which couldbe vulnerable to SQL injection using the designer feature.Further research shows that I can use sqlmap to determine ifphpMyAdmin is SQL injectable. I already have a Testing Ubuntu 16.04LTS Linux server with a Testing MySQL database and a TestingphpMyAdmin 4.8.4.
I have purposely installed phpMyAdmin 4.8.4 becausethis version was reported to be vulnerable to SQL injection using thedesigner feature, and our customer is using a vulnerable version,according to CVE-2019-6798. Then I proceeded todownload and execute sqlmap on our Ubuntu Linux desktop against ourTesting server.No matter how many commands I try, sqlmap always report thatphpMyAdmin 4.8.4 is.NOT. SQL injectable. Perhaps I was using thewrong sqlmap commands all the time? The following is one of the manysqlmap commands I have used.$ python sqlmap.py -u'; -level=1-dbms=mysql -sql-query='drop database'Replace database by database name.May I know what is the correct sqlmap command that I should use todetermine that my Testing phpMyAdmin 4.8.4 is SQL injectable?
I wouldlike to know if I can successfully drop/delete the Testing database onour Testing server. If I can successfully drop/delete the TestingMySQL database using sqlmap, I would be able to conclude that thehacker must have carried out SQL injection to drop/delete thecustomer's database. I have already turned off the Testing ModSecurityWeb Application Firewall on our Testing server to allow sqlmap to gothrough.Please point me to any good tutorial on SQL injection using sqlmap.Maybe I do not understand SQL injection well enough. Our customer isalso using a customised in-house inventory management system thatrelies on PHP application and MySQL database.Would open source Snort Intrusion Detection System (IDS) and IntrusionPrevention System (IPS) be able to detect and block SQL injection aswell?Please advise.Thank you very much.-BEGIN EMAIL SIGNATURE-The Gospel for all Targeted Individuals (TIs):The New York Times Microwave Weapons Are Prime Suspect in Ills ofU.S.
Embassy WorkersLink:.Singaporean Mr. Turritopsis Dohrnii Teo En Ming's AcademicQualifications as at 14 Feb 2019123-END EMAIL SIGNATURE. Attachments: On May 30, 2018, at 8:49 AM, Miroslav Stampar wrote: Hi. Just added new tamper script to the HEAD. Please update and try -tamper=0x2char p.s.
There is no need for unhex (as you'll see by running this new tamper script)Perfect, this works like a charm! Thanks for the quick update. Kind regards, Miroslav Stampar On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Brandon Perry wrote: I’ve come across a SQL injection that uppercases the input, so that 0xaaaa becomes 0XAAAA.
This isn’t a valid hex value in MySQL since 0X is required to use a lowercase x. I attempted to use a quick —eval argument to change the syntax from 0x to X’’, but the single quotes in the X’' syntax end up being escaped with double slashes so the syntax is still broken (X’’ - X’’). What are the chances a different encoding using UNHEX and CONCAT be used instead of 0x when using BENCHMARK? For instance: BENCHMARK(5000000,MD5(0xaaaa)) Could be rewritten as: BENCHMARK(5000000,MD5(UNHEX(CONCAT(CHAR(65),CHAR(65),CHAR(65),CHAR(65)) Perhaps this is attainable with a tamper script and I am missing it?
This would prevent the application from breaking the SQL syntax by changing 0x to 0X. Any thoughts are appreciated! - Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! sqlmap-users mailing list sqlmap-users@. - Miroslav Stampar.
Attachments:Hi.Just added new tamper script to the HEAD. Please update and try-tamper=0x2charp.s. There is no need for unhex (as you'll see by running this new tamperscript)Kind regards,Miroslav StamparOn Wed, May 30, 2018 at 12:49 PM, Brandon Perry wrote: I’ve come across a SQL injection that uppercases the input, so that 0xaaaa becomes 0XAAAA. This isn’t a valid hex value in MySQL since 0X is required to use a lowercase x. I attempted to use a quick —eval argument to change the syntax from 0x to X’’, but the single quotes in the X’' syntax end up being escaped with double slashes so the syntax is still broken (X’’ - X’’). What are the chances a different encoding using UNHEX and CONCAT be used instead of 0x when using BENCHMARK? For instance: BENCHMARK(5000000,MD5(0xaaaa)) Could be rewritten as: BENCHMARK(5000000,MD5(UNHEX(CONCAT(CHAR(65),CHAR(65),CHAR(65),CHAR(65)) Perhaps this is attainable with a tamper script and I am missing it?
This would prevent the application from breaking the SQL syntax by changing 0x to 0X. Any thoughts are appreciated! -Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! sqlmap-users mailing list [email protected] Stampar. Attachments:I’ve come across a SQL injection that uppercases the input, so that 0xaaaa becomes 0XAAAA.
This isn’t a valid hex value in MySQL since 0X is required to use a lowercase x. I attempted to use a quick —eval argument to change the syntax from 0x to X’’, but the single quotes in the X’' syntax end up being escaped with double slashes so the syntax is still broken (X’’ - X’’).What are the chances a different encoding using UNHEX and CONCAT be used instead of 0x when using BENCHMARK?For instance:BENCHMARK(5000000,MD5(0xaaaa))Could be rewritten as:BENCHMARK(5000000,MD5(UNHEX(CONCAT(CHAR(65),CHAR(65),CHAR(65),CHAR(65))Perhaps this is attainable with a tamper script and I am missing it? This would prevent the application from breaking the SQL syntax by changing 0x to 0X.Any thoughts are appreciated! Attachments:In lots of cases you'll have some sort of length constraints in either GETor POST body. Putting all those SELECTs into single requests simply won'twork (especially in GET cases).One more thing.
![Sites Sites](http://cdncontribute.geeksforgeeks.org/wp-content/uploads/explained_columns.png)
In case of (e.g.) MsSQL there is no 'LIMIT m,n' mechanism.Hence, sqlmap uses something called 'pivoting' to dump table content, whichrequires different queries for different column values.ByeOn Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 1:59 AM, Brandon Perry wrote: I’m currently exploiting a recent vulnerability announced in Foreman versions 1.9+ through 1.16.1. The available techniques are boolean, time, and error-based. Error based is the fastest obviously, but it seems like it could be faster. Currently, it performs an error-based exfil in a similar way MySQL error-based injections are done, which is a single value at a time. IIRC, MySQL errors get truncated so that you generally can’t exfil more than 50 or so characters at a time, so this strategy makes sense in those cases. However, PostgreSQL errors that are bubbled up don’t (seem to) have this limitation and will return very lengthy error messages. Currently, sqlmap will grab a value per column per row per request.
Attachments:I’m currently exploiting a recent vulnerability announced in Foreman versions 1.9+ through 1.16.1. The available techniques are boolean, time, and error-based.Error based is the fastest obviously, but it seems like it could be faster. Currently, it performs an error-based exfil in a similar way MySQL error-based injections are done, which is a single value at a time. IIRC, MySQL errors get truncated so that you generally can’t exfil more than 50 or so characters at a time, so this strategy makes sense in those cases.However, PostgreSQL errors that are bubbled up don’t (seem to) have this limitation and will return very lengthy error messages.Currently, sqlmap will grab a value per column per row per request. Attachments: On Aug 15, 2017, at 8:21 PM, Miroslav Stampar wrote: Hi.
sqlmap either does the full dump (FULL UNION case) or one row at a time (PARTIAL UNION case - e.g. Single row of result). There is no 'let's dump N rows per request' - this is really not possible to do in a simple and generic way as targets tend to cut the results in most exotic ways (e.g. First 1024 characters).
Also, concatenation of rows in non-MySQL DBMSes is a challenge at least.Thanks, you’re right. I’m thinking about this purely from a MySQL perspective.Thanks for the insight. Bye On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Brandon Perry wrote: Looking at some later requests, it appears that dumping a row from a table is performed this way (each column is concated together). Attachments:Hi.sqlmap either does the full dump (FULL UNION case) or one row at a time(PARTIAL UNION case - e.g. Single row of result). There is no 'let's dump Nrows per request' - this is really not possible to do in a simple andgeneric way as targets tend to cut the results in most exotic ways (e.g.first 1024 characters).
Also, concatenation of rows in non-MySQL DBMSes isa challenge at least.ByeOn Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Brandon Perry wrote: Looking at some later requests, it appears that dumping a row from a table is performed this way (each column is concated together). Attachments:Looking at some later requests, it appears that dumping a row from a table is performed this way (each column is concated together). Attachments:Currently, it seems that sqlmap will use a payload such as the following is a UNIONable parameter is found that can only return one row in order for data to be exfil’ed.-16301 UNION ALL SELECT NULL,NULL,(SELECT CONCAT(0x,IFNULL(CAST(schemaname AS CHAR),0x20),0x716a706271) FROM INFORMATIONSCHEMA.SCHEMATA LIMIT 4,1),NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULL,NULLWhen enumerating databases in an injection like this, sqlmap will make a single request per db name (note the LIMIT clause). This is a bit inefficient.
With the latest commit I've (at least) prevented that the last valueis the same as the following 'randomized' (e.g. Original 1 - random 1 wrote: Hi. It goes like this. Parameter is randomized, BUT, the parameter value holds the original form. This means that if your parameter is single digit, the following request will be a random value chosen from the 0-9. This basically means that there is a chance that the following 'random' value could be the same as the last one AND that you'll soon be left without any new values (after avg. Attachments:Hi.It goes like this.
![Sqlmap Vulnerable Sites List 2019 Sqlmap Vulnerable Sites List 2019](/uploads/1/2/4/1/124117887/305676024.png)
Parameter is randomized, BUT, the parameter value holdsthe original form. This means that if your parameter is single digit, thefollowing request will be a random value chosen from the 0-9. Thisbasically means that there is a chance that the following 'random' valuecould be the same as the last one AND that you'll soon be left without anynew values (after avg. 8-9 requests).Hence, use some larger 'original' value for that same parameter you want torandomize:)ByeOn Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Brandon Perry wrote: On Feb 27, 2017, at 4:28 PM, Brandon Perry wrote: Hi, testing —randomize for the first time. I have an injection that is certainly boolean-injectable as I can exploit by hand, but the content of the response can change if the url requested seems to have been hit before.
For instance, if I do GET /fdsa/1%20or%201=1, 100 bytes are returned. If I do it again, I get 150 bytes back from now on. If I append a garbage HTTP parameter and randomize the value in the parameter, I always get 100 bytes back. It’s a weird injection, but sqlmap seems to think that the page contents is changing during warm-up, even if I append a garbage parameter and tell —randomize to randomize it.
16:20:14 WARNING target URL is not stable. Sqlmap will base the page comparison on a sequence matcher. If no dynamic nor injectable parameters are detected, or in case of junk results, refer to user's manual paragraph 'Page comparison' and provide a string or regular expression to match on I have verified by hand that changing the HTTP parameter value each request results in the same data from the injection being returned from the server. It seems —randomize isn’t being respected in the very beginning. Any thoughts? Hopefully this makes sense. Doing testing through burp suite, I see that the HTTP parameter is indeed randomized, so I am not sure what’s up yet.
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! sqlmap-users mailing list [email protected] Stampar. Attachments: On Feb 27, 2017, at 4:28 PM, Brandon Perry wrote: Hi, testing —randomize for the first time. I have an injection that is certainly boolean-injectable as I can exploit by hand, but the content of the response can change if the url requested seems to have been hit before. For instance, if I do GET /fdsa/1%20or%201=1, 100 bytes are returned. If I do it again, I get 150 bytes back from now on. If I append a garbage HTTP parameter and randomize the value in the parameter, I always get 100 bytes back.
It’s a weird injection, but sqlmap seems to think that the page contents is changing during warm-up, even if I append a garbage parameter and tell —randomize to randomize it. 16:20:14 WARNING target URL is not stable.
Sqlmap will base the page comparison on a sequence matcher. If no dynamic nor injectable parameters are detected, or in case of junk results, refer to user's manual paragraph 'Page comparison' and provide a string or regular expression to match on I have verified by hand that changing the HTTP parameter value each request results in the same data from the injection being returned from the server.
It seems —randomize isn’t being respected in the very beginning. Any thoughts? Hopefully this makes sense.Doing testing through burp suite, I see that the HTTP parameter is indeed randomized, so I am not sure what’s up yet. Attachments:Hi, testing —randomize for the first time.I have an injection that is certainly boolean-injectable as I can exploit by hand, but the content of the response can change if the url requested seems to have been hit before.For instance, if I do GET /fdsa/1%20or%201=1, 100 bytes are returned. If I do it again, I get 150 bytes back from now on.If I append a garbage HTTP parameter and randomize the value in the parameter, I always get 100 bytes back.It’s a weird injection, but sqlmap seems to think that the page contents is changing during warm-up, even if I append a garbage parameter and tell —randomize to randomize it.16:20:14 WARNING target URL is not stable.
Sqlmap will base the page comparison on a sequence matcher. If no dynamic nor injectable parameters are detected, or in case of junk results, refer to user's manual paragraph 'Page comparison' and provide a string or regular expression to match onI have verified by hand that changing the HTTP parameter value each request results in the same data from the injection being returned from the server. It seems —randomize isn’t being respected in the very beginning.Any thoughts? Hopefully this makes sense. Attachments:Thanks, I'll give it a go specifying the number of columns when I'm nextallowed to test. It might also cause problems that a couple of the columnshave to be dates so might have to resort to scripting it by hand.RobinOn Sat, 25 Feb 2017, 07:34 Miroslav Stampar, wrote: p.s.
You have a very specific case. I had a couple of similar and had to make my own script(s).
Basically, data is provided to two separate DBMSes, while you are targeting the second one. To get to it you have to make a payload that won't make problems with the first one. In your case I would try to provide only valid options to sqlmap (e.g.data '.?logname=admin' -technique=U -union-cols=31 -dbms=mysql) and cross the fingers. If that fails you'll have to make a case specific script. For MySQL enumeration queries you can always take a look into xml/payloads.xml On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Miroslav Stampar miroslav.stampar@.
wrote: 'Do you know the maximum number of fields the union will do' - by default 1-10. If there are more techniques usable (e.g.
Boolean), it will extend it. Also, if ORDER BY is usable it will try to find the number of columns without limitations. You have a very specific case.
I had a couple of similar and had tomake my own script(s). Basically, data is provided to two separate DBMSes,while you are targeting the second one. To get to it you have to make apayload that won't make problems with the first one.
In your case I wouldtry to provide only valid options to sqlmap (e.g.data'.?logname=admin' -technique=U -union-cols=31 -dbms=mysql) and crossthe fingers. If that fails you'll have to make a case specific script. ForMySQL enumeration queries you can always take a look into xml/payloads.xmlOn Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 8:17 AM, Miroslav Stampar wrote: 'Do you know the maximum number of fields the union will do' - by default 1-10. If there are more techniques usable (e.g. Boolean), it will extend it. Also, if ORDER BY is usable it will try to find the number of columns without limitations. If you want to manually extend, use -union-cols (e.g.
1-100) Bye On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Robin Wood wrote: Annoyingly my test window is closed and I'll probably not get to talk to the client will Monday but will try this out on a test box just to watch the traffic and see if it is doing what I think should work. Ta Robin On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, 23:23 Chris Oakleywrote: I.think. (going from memory here) that it's higher than that by default. There's also the -union-cols=30-40, so you should be good On 24 February 2017 at 18:17, Robin Wood wrote: I hadn't tried the custom injection point, I'll give that a try. Attachments:'Do you know the maximum number of fields the union will do' - by default1-10. If there are more techniques usable (e.g. Boolean), it will extendit.
Also, if ORDER BY is usable it will try to find the number of columnswithout limitations. If you want to manually extend, use -union-cols (e.g.1-100)ByeOn Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 12:28 AM, Robin Wood wrote: Annoyingly my test window is closed and I'll probably not get to talk to the client will Monday but will try this out on a test box just to watch the traffic and see if it is doing what I think should work. Ta Robin On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, 23:23 Chris Oakleywrote: I.think. (going from memory here) that it's higher than that by default. There's also the -union-cols=30-40, so you should be good On 24 February 2017 at 18:17, Robin Wood wrote: I hadn't tried the custom injection point, I'll give that a try. Attachments:Annoyingly my test window is closed and I'll probably not get to talk tothe client will Monday but will try this out on a test box just to watchthe traffic and see if it is doing what I think should work.TaRobinOn Fri, 24 Feb 2017, 23:23 Chris Oakley, wrote: I.think.
(going from memory here) that it's higher than that by default. There's also the -union-cols=30-40, so you should be good On 24 February 2017 at 18:17, Robin Wood wrote: I hadn't tried the custom injection point, I'll give that a try. Attachments:I.think. (going from memory here) that it's higher than that by default.There's also the -union-cols=30-40, so you should be goodOn 24 February 2017 at 18:17, Robin Wood wrote: I hadn't tried the custom injection point, I'll give that a try. Attachments:I hadn't tried the custom injection point, I'll give that a try.
Hello,I'm trying sqlmap (latest windows exe) against a vulnerable site and Ialways get sqlmap telling that the parameter is not dynamic (then sqlmap isterminated). Could you explain how does this logic (the dynamic test) work?The page in question is a user/password form, sent via POST method, whereonly the user parameter (called 'txtUsuario') is injectable. Hi Roman,Roman Medina-Heigl Hernandez wrote. The page in question is a user/password form, sent via POST method, where only the user parameter (called 'txtUsuario') is injectable. I manually checked it and: - if an arbitrary user is entered, I get a 200 response with 'Incorrect user' message. if I enter a ' char, I get a 500 response and an error message from the database:) - if I enter the typical 'aaa' or '=' (which is evaluated to TRUE), I get a 200 response, this time with 'Incorrect password' (so user test is passed!!!).The comparison and dynamicity test is done based on page content, not onresponse codes.